Hyponatraemia in Hospitalised Children: A Retrospective Survey in Acute Paediatric Admissions in Hong Kong with Focus on Intravenous Fluid Practices
Purpose: Recent intravenous fluid (IVF) guidelines advocate empirical isotonic maintenance fluids in children to prevent potentially dangerous hyponatraemia. To see if this practice is appropriate for Hong Kong, we aimed to review the frequency and nature of hyponatraemia in acute paediatric settings, and its association with hypotonic IVF usage. Methods: Using Hospital Authority CDARS, we identified all public hospitalisation episodes of children aged 1 month to 18 years with hyponatraemia (Na<135 mmol/L) during 2015. Those with severe hyponatraemia (Na<127 mmol/L) had their clinical details and IVF use analysed. Findings: Hyponatraemia occurred in 8.8% of 60,960 paediatric admissions. True severe hyponatraemia occurred in 0.22% of all admissions, with 56% occurring at admission. Five cases had hyponatraemic seizures. Of 110 cases with hypovolaemic or euvolaemic severe hyponatraemia, 22 cases of hospital-acquired hyponatraemia were identified where hypotonic fluids likely contributed, as replacement, hyperhydration or maintenance fluids. Conclusions: Serious hyponatraemia may occur in association with hypotonic IVF. Paediatricians must prescribe IVF with care. Safe prescription practices are discussed.
目的：近期靜脈輸液指南提倡對兒童經驗性等張維持液體治療，以預防潛在的危害性低鈉血症。為瞭解此操作在香港應用是否恰當，作者就此對兒童急診入院病例中的低鈉血症發生率和病情，及其與低張性靜脈輸液的相關性，進行綜合回顧。方法：作者經香港醫院管理局CDARS（臨床數據分析及記錄系統）查出2015年度所有公立醫院住院中，年齡1個月至18歲病人患有低鈉血症（Na<135 mmol/L）的例次。對其中的重度低鈉血症（Na<127 mmol/L）的病例，進行臨床細節和靜脈輸液使用情況分析。結果：低鈉血症見於8.8%的60,960例兒童入院病例。真正重度低鈉血症見於0.22%的所有入院病例，其中56%發生於入院時。低鈉血症性驚厥有5例。在低容量或容積性重度低鈉血症110例中，22例為院內獲得性低鈉血症。其中作為補充液體損失、水化過量和維持液體治療，低張性液體治療可能導致其發生。結論：嚴重低鈉血症的發生可與低張性靜脈輸液有關。兒科醫生必須細心開處靜脈輸液治療。文中也論及安全處方的規範。
Keyword : Hyponatraemia; Hypotonic fluid; Intravenous fluid; Paediatric
The mainstream intravenous fluid (IVF) prescription practice in paediatrics had for years been based on the work of Holliday and Segar in 1950s in healthy children, where the "ideal" maintenance fluids was calculated to be 0.2% sodium and 5% glucose.1 Since the 1990s, reports of over 100 cases of iatrogenic deaths or permanent neurologic impairment related to hyponatraemia in hospitalised children (including previously healthy children after elective surgery or simple problems like viral infections) have pointed to the dangers of hypotonic fluids, due to the common entity of syndrome of inappropriate ADH (SIADH) in many physiological or disease states, impairing free water excretion.2
The UK National Health Service 2007 alert3 recommended 0.45% saline for maintenance fluids for the majority of children and 0.9% saline for children at risk for hyponatraemia. Since then, there have been many randomised controlled trials (RCT) and metanalyses comparing hypotonic and isotonic fluids, initially in post-operative and paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) children, but recently in general paediatric settings also.4-6 These trials and metanalyses have all shown isotonic fluids to be protective against hyponatraemia; and is a safer choice than hypotonic fluids. However, the risk of hyponatraemia in general paediatric settings is considered low, and with concerns about hypernatraemia, hyperchloraemic acidosis and fluid overload from isotonic fluids, the recommendations of using isotonic fluids were not widely followed.7,8
In 2015, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published a guideline on intravenous fluid therapy in hospitalised children, recommending initial use of isotonic crystalloids for routine maintenance.9 This was followed an American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) clinical practice guideline that strongly recommended the use of isotonic maintenance IVF.10 An informal survey in 2016 amongst acute paediatric units within the public system (Hospital Authority or HA) in Hong Kong showed 0.45% saline to be the most common empirical choice for IVF, followed by 0.3% saline; while isotonic solution was not a routine. There is thus a need to review IVF use in the local general paediatric setting. A Working Group was commissioned by HA Paediatric Coordinating Committee in 2016 to perform a retrospective survey on hyponatraemia across all acute paediatric units within HA, which looks after ~80% children requiring acute hospital care in Hong Kong. The aim is firstly, to find out the prevalence of hyponatraemia in acute paediatric, non-surgical settings in Hong Kong, and identify the clinical situations where it occurs. The second aim is to see if hypotonic IVF is a contributing factor to hyponatraemia. This information may shed light on the need to modify existing IVF practices.
Using the HA Clinical Data Analysis & Reporting System, we searched for hospitalisation episodes of children admitted aged 1 month to 18 years into all 12 HA acute paediatric units during the year 2015, with serum sodium (Na) of <135 and <130 mmol/L at any stage during the hospitalisation. To focus on general paediatric cases, neonatal and surgical cases were excluded.
Due to the large number of cases and the preliminary impression that a significant proportion of those with Na 128-129 mmol/L had hyponatraemia at presentation and unlikely to be related to IVF, only those with Na of ≤127 mmol/L (defined as severe hyponatraemia) were systematically studied. We believe this will include all cases of clinically significant hyponatraemia. Each patient's record and intake-output chart was checked by the respective center coordinator. Age; principle and secondary diagnoses; admission sodium level; timing and lowest sodium level; symptoms of hyponatraemia are noted. The composition, volume and duration of intravenous fluids as bolus, replacement or maintenance; proportion and type of oral fluids are recorded; together with subsequent management and progress of sodium level. Likely causes/ contributors to hyponatraemia are noted if known, including dehydration, fluid overload, drugs, laboratory pointers to SAIDH. One investigator (LCKL) went through the case information and selected out those for which IVF are likely contributors to hyponatraemia, seeking consensus with center coordinators and Working Group members. As dilutional hyponatraemia is the cause in fluid overload cases (and the key is fluid restriction and not IVF composition), our analysis mainly focused on euvolaemic or hypovolaemic cases and their relationship with IVF practices. The study is approved by the Hospital Authority Ethics Committees.
Prevalence and Causes of Hyponatraemia
Out of a total of 60,960 paediatric admission episodes in 2015, the number of episodes with Na <135 mmol/L, <130 mmol/L and 127 mmol/L were 5359 (8.8%), 357 (0.59%) and 172 (0.28%) respectively (Figure 1). The 172 severe hyponatraemia (Na ≤127 mmol/L) cases were studied in detail, and 136 episodes were true hyponatraemia. The proportions that were hypovolaemia, euvolaemia and hypervolaemia are illustrated in Figure 2. Hypervolaemic cases are dilutional hyponatraemia and unrelated to IVF, so are not the focus of this survey. Of the remaining 110 hypovolaemia and euvolaemic cases, hypovolaemic hyponatraemia cases mainly included dehydration due to gastro-intestinal loss or poor oral intake; only one case from renal fluid loss. Euvolaemic hyponatraemia cases were likely related to SIADH. Over half had infectious/inflammatory conditions, of which a significant proportion (40%) occurred in children with chronic illness (like neuromuscular diseases, epilepsy). Other euvolaemic cases had central nervous system (CNS) conditions (28%) or cancer related causes (20%).
A breakdown of the diagnoses as related to severity of hyponatraemia is seen in Table 1. Hyponatraemia cases related to hypovolaemia rarely had profound hyponatraemia of Na ≤120 mmol/L. However, 20% (12/61) euvolaemia cases had profound hyponatraemia, showing SIADH related cases are more prone to profound hyponatraemia.
Admission Hyponatraemia and Empirical Fluids Used
Among hypovolaemic or euvolaemic severe hyponatraemia cases, severe hyponatraemia was already present at admission in 56% (Right hand column, Table 1). Young infants with bronchiolitis were particularly at risk, with 2 cases presenting with hyponatraemic seizure (see below). When IVF was used in these severe hyponatraemia cases, 0.45% saline was used in the majority. In 8 cases, fluids ≤0.3% saline was used. None received 0.9% saline.
Five cases developed seizures associated with hyponatraemia (Table 2 for clinical details). Of note, 3 cases presenting with hyponatraemic seizures were young infants associated with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis (patients A-C). In the other 2 cases (D-E), hyponatraemic seizures occurred 2 days and 28 hours after hyponatraemic fluids (both 0.3% saline) were started.
Hospital-acquired Severe Hyponatraemia
Overall, 31 cases had hospital-acquired severe hyponatraemia, as defined by sodium falling by ≥4 mmol/L from admission to ≤127 mmol/L, or failing to improve adequately above 127 mmol/L during hospital stay. Of these, 22 cases were identified where hypotonic fluid likely contributed to hyponatraemia, based on the time frame and clinical details. In these cases, the clinical situations could be classified into 3 broad categories: 1) those where hypotonic fluids were used in effect as replacement fluid in dehydration (Table 3A); 2) those where hypotonic fluids were used as maintenance fluids in settings at risk of SIADH (Table 3B); 3) those where hypotonic fluids were used for hyperhydration for drugs (Table 3C).
In these 22 patients, empirical 0.45% saline was used in 15 cases, empirical fluids ≤0.3% saline was used in 7 cases. Two patients developed seizures likely related to the hospital-acquired hyponatraemia (patients 3 and 11). The 3 categories are summarised below.
Category 1: Hypotonic Fluids Used as Replacement and Maintenance in Dehydration (Table 3A).
In these 6 cases, hypotonic (0.3% to 0.45% saline) fluid was used as both replacement and maintenance fluid; with or without prior 20-30 ml/kg saline boluses. In three patients, serum sodium decreased from normal values to 125-127 mmol/L over 12 hours to 2 days, including one with hyponatraemic seizure (patient 3). In the remaining three patients (patients 4-6) , severe hyponatraemia at admission failed to improve adequately.
Category 2: Hypotonic Fluids Used as Maintenance Fluids in Patients at Risk for SIADH (Table 3B)
In these 12 cases at risk of SIADH, the main clinical situations were respiratory (e.g. bronchiolitis, pneumonia), infection or inflammation (e.g. viral illness, sepsis, haemophagocytic lympohistiocytosis), neurological (e.g. blocked VP shunt, intracranial haemorrhage), and cancer. Some patients had multiple factors operating (e.g. patient 17 cancer patient with high stool sodium loss).
As to fluid rates given, none were fluid restricted. Hypotonic fluids both at standard and higher than standard rates were associated with hospital acquired hyponatraemia. Seven patients received hypotonic IVF at higher than standard rates, empirically given for "high fever" or in young infants where a "neonatal pattern" of IVF was prescribed. One young infant (patient 11) developed hyponatraemic status epilepticus. Two patients (patients 12 and 13) received "standard rate IVF" in addition to enteral fluids; which totalled above twice standard volumes. The remaining 5 patients truly received standard rate fluids, and hyponatraemia resolved after increasing sodium in IVF with or without fluid restriction.
Category 3: Hypotonic Fluids Used for Hyperhydration (Table 3C)
In five cases (no. 19-23), hypotonic fluids were used for protocol hyperhydration for cyclophosphamide. Sodium levels decreased from normal down to severe/profound levels (118-125 mmol/L) within hours to one day. They included patients on high dose as well as low dose cyclophosphamide.
Tables 3A-C Case details of 22 hospital-acquired hyponatraemia where hypotonic fluids likely contributed to hyponatraemia For simplicity, only saline part of fluid mentioned. Abbreviations: D = Day; O/A = on admission; NS = normal saline.
Frequency of Hyponatraemia and Implications of Admission Hyponatraemia
Our cohort shows that in the year 2015, mild (Na <135 mmol/L) and moderate (<130 mmol/L) hyponatraemia is not uncommon amongst paediatric inpatients, representing 8.8% and 0.59% respectively, though there may be some over-estimation from laboratory error or pseudohyponatraemia. Even so, 136 (0.22%) acute hospitalisations had true severe (Na ≤127 mmol/L) or profound (Na ≤120 mmol/L) hyponatraemia; with 5 cases having neurological sequelae. This shows that hyponatraemia is a genuine risk in the acute general paediatric setting.
Not only is hyponatraemia common, but it is also common at admission. Over half (56%) of the 110 hypovolaemic/euvolaemic severe hyponatraemia cases already had Na ≤127 mmol/L at admission. Our findings are consistent with the common risk of hyponatraemia reported in general paediatric patients. Neville11 found 36% children with gastroenteritis were hyponatraemic at admission. Don12 found that 45% of children with pneumonia were hyponatraemic and seemed associated with pneumonia severity. Hanna13 reported that the incidence of admission hyponatraemia in infants with bronchiolitis was 33%, with 11% exhibiting serum sodium <130 mmol/L.
Ill patients admitted to PICU may also have admission hyponatraemia ranging from 23 to 33%.14,15 The common occurrence of admission hyponatraemia has implications on our empirical choice of fluids, as isotonic (but not hypotonic) fluids will normalise low plasma sodium.11,15,16 In our cases with admission hyponatraemia, hypotonic fluids worsened or delayed improvement in some cases (e.g. cases 2, 4-6, 8, 11, 13, 15-17 in Tables 3A and B). In other cases, usually in those who were also feeding orally (probably indicating the child was not as ill), added oral sodium or fluid restriction may still raise sodium above 130 mml/L despite use of 0.45% saline, though sodium often remained in the mild hyponatraemia range.
Choice of IVF to Replace Volume Deficit
Our survey shows hypotonic fluids when used to replace fluid deficit (sometimes erroneously prescribed as "increased maintenance rates") may lead to hospital acquired hyponatraemia. Dehydration stimulates physiological ADH release which impairs free water excretion. If a volume-depleted child in a hyper-ADH state is given hypotonic fluids, there is risk of hyponatraemia. Neville also showed 0.9% saline reduced hyponatraemia for replacement and maintenance, compared with 0.45% saline, irrespective of rapid or standard rehydration rates in gastroenteritis.11 According to various guidelines for rehydration in acute gastroenteritis, those with severe normo- or hyponatraemic dehydration without shock may receive replacement of deficit with isotonic fluid over 2-4 hours.17,18 Once fluid volume is restored, they can be given oral rehydration fluids or dextrose containing IV maintenance fluids, taking into account ongoing losses.
Choice of IVF in Hyperhydration
In our series, 4 cases had hospital-acquired hyponatraemia during hyper-hydration for cyclophosphamide. It is well known high dose cyclophosphamide in malignancy (less commonly low dose in autoimmune disease) is associated with SIADH, water intoxication and seizures.19 Chemotherapy-induced nausea is also a potent stimulus to ADH release. The risk of hyponatraemia in this setting may be minimised by using isotonic saline rather than hypotonic fluids to maintain a high urine output.
Choice of Maintenance IVF in Children at Risk of SIADH: Tonicity and Rate of Fluid
Amongst the causes of hyponatraemia in our cohort, the largest proportion (Figure 2) and the most severe hyponatraemia (Table 1) can be attributed to diverse conditions at risk for SIADH - the most common being infection/inflammation, CNS and cancer-related causes.
As this study is only a survey of severe hyponatraemia and not IVF prescription, we are unable to attribute a causal link between hyponatraemia and hypotonic fluids. However some points can still be observed when choosing the tonicity and rate of empirical IVF. All of the 12 hospital-acquired hyponatraemia cases related to SIADH (Table 3B) were associated with hypotonic fluids (0.45% saline in 7, ≤0.3% saline in 5 cases), and none received isotonic fluids. Hyponatraemia was successfully treated by increasing sodium orally or in IVF, with or without fluid restriction, suggesting isotonic fluids may have been a better alternative. Indeed, in the 8 patients given ≤0.3% saline in our cohort, hyponatraemia either developed or worsened in 7, the lowest sodium being 118 mmol/L, including two who developed hyponatraemic seizure. So it appears IVF with tonicity of ≤0.3% saline is best avoided, except in special circumstances like renal concentrating defects.
This preference for isotonic versus hypotonic fluids is clear from various systematic reviews4-6 and evidence based guidelines9,10 that included 17 RCT and 2455 patients. Isotonic fluid has definitively been shown to protect against hyponatraemia and is a safer choice than hypotonic fluids. In recent years, even the previous lack of RCT in general paediatric patients has been addressed by studies involving children with a broad range of medical diagnoses,20-23 CNS infections24 and gastroenteritis.16 The largest of this is the PIMS trial involving 690 children,22 showing that an isotonic balanced solution (Plasma-lyte 148) was protective against hyponatraemia compared with 0.45% saline (4% vs. 11%; odds ratio 0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.61; P=0.001), where median fluid volume of 80% standard maintenance was given. Importantly, there was no difference in hypernatraemia (sodium >150 mmol/L). Other RCTs also confirmed the safety of isotonic IVF as regards to hypernatraemia. However, other side effects like hypervolaemia and hyperchloraemic acidosis (when normal saline is used) have not been well studied.
Despite the strong evidence for isotonic fluids in general, the authors consider the evidence for its use in infants <3 months of age to be less clear. Young infants <3 months old may be at greater risk of hypernatraemia and 5% glucose might be inadequate in this age. Almost all RCTs of general paediatric patients chose 3 months20,22-24 or 6 months16 as lower age limit, except Friedman's RCT21 which included infants from 1 month old, though the numbers are likely small based on the subjects' median and interquartile age ranges. Indeed, in an RCT of term neonates receiving IVF for hyperbilirubinaemia, almost 40% of those on isotonic fluids developed hypernatraemia.25 Despite the recommendations of empirical use of isotonic saline in well term neonates (NICE guideline) or infants older than 28 days (AAP guideline), we think it is prudent to monitor carefully for hypernatraemia and hypochloraemic acidosis in young infants; and be ready to change to 0.45% saline should hypernatraemia occur.
Besides fluid tonicity, fluid rate is the other important component of IVF prescription, and the two are inter-related. Some authors have argued that fluid restriction with hypotonic fluids would be sufficient to prevent hyponatraemia.26 Studies have explored the relative importance of fluid tonicity versus rate in general paediatric,20 PICU27 and post-operative settings,28,29 and found that fluid restriction could not prevent hypotonic fluid induced hyponatraemia. However the study numbers were small, and the fluid used in the non-surgical studies was 0.18% saline, which may not be applicable if 0.45% saline is used. Larger studies are needed to clarify the effect of fluid restriction.
Though these is no evidence based recommendations for fluid rate, most recent guidelines recommend empirical isotonic maintenance fluid at 50-80%,9 or two-thirds standard rates30-32 for those at risk of SIADH, though some advocate full maintenance rate.33 In any case, empirical use of hypotonic fluids above standard rates should be avoided. One cannot over-emphasise the importance of ongoing monitoring of fluid and electrolyte balance to adjust both rate and tonicity of IVF.
One other learning point regarding fluid rate from our survey is that, to avoid retention of electrolyte-free water, one should take into consideration all fluid intake, including gastrostomy, oral intake or medications, with the maintenance IVF rate adjusted down accordingly.
Special Groups of Patients at Risk of SIADH
It is noteworthy that a significant proportion of SIADH cases occurred in children with chronic neurological diseases (e.g. cerebral palsy, epilepsy, myopathy). Such children may be at particular risk of SIADH during acute illness. One explanation is that 50% body water is in skeletal muscle in normal people. Therefore, in patients with marked muscle atrophy or muscle disease, much less electrolyte-free water needs to be retained to cause a rapid decline in sodium levels.34
Also noteworthy in our cohort are 5 cases of significant hyponatraemia in young infants with RSV bronchiolitis; three of them presented with hyponatraemic seizures, another fatal case presenting with sodium 126 mmol/L died from ARDS and multi-organ failure. This association of hyponatraemia or hyponatraemic seizures in bronchiolitis has been reported in 2 series. In a retrospective review of severe RSV bronchiolitis requiring intensive care in UK,35 the incidence of ICU admission hyponatraemia in 91 infants (median age 6 weeks) was 33%, with 11% exhibiting a serum sodium <130 mmol/L. Four infants suffered hyponatraemic seizures at ICU admission (Na 114-123 mmol/L); three had received hypotonic intravenous fluids at 100-150 ml/kg/day before. Another retrospective study36 showed admission hyponatraemia in 84/233 (36%) children <2 years with bronchiolitis. Seizure occurred in a 29-day-old child with sodium 123 mmol/L while receiving two-thirds volume of 0.18% saline. This suggests that fluid restriction only may not be able to prevent dangerous hyponatraemia, and that empirical isotonic fluids with fluid restriction is safer in young infants with bronchiolitis.
Choice of Fluids in Setting of Hyponatraemia
Even when laboratory results revealed hyponatraemia, our survey revealed a common reluctance among doctors to change to isotonic fluids. Those on 0.3% saline were only changed to 0.45% saline, or had oral sodium added. In two, the rate of 0.45% was increased, thinking that this will increase the total sodium given to the patient, forgetting that free water is also increased and may actually worsen the hyponatraemia. The NICE IVF guidelines advise that if asymptomatic hyponatraemia is found, fluid status should be reviewed. Action taken should include changing a hypotonic fluid to isotonic fluid, and restricting maintenance fluids for patients who are hypervolaemic or at risk of SIADH.
Monitoring of Electrolytes
Another observation from the survey was that electrolytes should be checked more frequently especially in cases with complex pathophysiology (e.g. Case 3, Table 3A) or in young infants (e.g. Case 11, Table 3B). In the latter case, hyponatraemia seizure already occurred at 28 hours. If sodium trend was monitored earlier in these high risk cases (at least by 24 hours), it could have prompted earlier adjustment of IVF prescription before morbidity occurred. In other cases, there was a failure to take appropriate action when decreasing sodium trends were noted. NICE IVF guidelines recommend systematic monitoring when a child is started on IVF, then at least every 24 hours, or more frequently if there are electrolyte disturbances.
As our survey is a retrospective study on hyponatraemia and not a survey of IVF prescription, we cannot comment on the incidence of hyponatraemia in those give hypotonic IVF or attribute causal associations to the fluids used. Also, we only looked at cases with Na ≤127, but we believe looking at the severest end of the spectrum will have revealed the most significant learning points in current practices.
This one year survey has shown that in acute general paediatric settings, mild hyponatraemia is common; and true severe hyponatraemia is not rare, including hyponatraemia at admission. Though rare, morbidities including hyponatraemic seizures do occur, and in some cases, preventable. Cases of hospital-acquired hyponatraemia were identified; most associated with the use of hypotonic fluids as replacement, hyperhydration or maintenance fluids at high as well as standard rates. Some safe practice points have been highlighted from our survey:
In summary, an individualised approach is needed for IVF prescription (tonicity and rate) in hospitalised children, taking into account age, volume status, pathophysiology (including risk of SIADH or the rare occurrence of increased free water loss through kidney or skin) and sodium result. No single fluid composition or rate is ideal for all children. Nor should it mean isotonic fluids should be default maintenance fluid in all children; or that they are totally without risks especially in those <3 months. To facilitate safe IVF prescription, clinical pathways can be devised. In all fluid choices, frequent and ongoing monitoring of child's fluid balance, hydration and electrolyte status is important. All doctors should treat IVF prescription with care, just as one would prescribe drugs.
Special thanks to Ms Phoebe Tse for her clerical support.
Declaration of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest regarding this study to declare.
1. Holliday MA, Segar WE. The maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid therapy. Paediatr 1957;19:823-32.
2. Koczmara C, Wade AW, Skippen P, et al. Hospital-acquired acute hyponatremia and reports of pediatric deaths. Dynamics 2010;21:21-6.
3. NHS alert 2007. [online]. Available from: http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entryid45=59809.
4. Choong K, Kho ME, Menon K, Bohn D. Hypotonic versus isotonic saline in hospitalized children: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:828-35.
5. McNab S, Ware RS, Neville KA, et al. Isotonic versus hypotonic solutions for maintenance intravenous fluid administration in children (Review). [online]. The Cochrane Library 2014; Issue 12. Available from: http://www.thecochranelibrary.com.
6. Padua AP, Macaraya JR, Dans LF, Anacleto FE Jr. Isotonic versus hypotonic saline solution for maintenance intravenous fluid therapy in children: a systematic review. Pediatr Nephrol 2015;30:1163-72.
7. Armon K, Riordan A, Playfor S, Millman G, Khader A; Paediatric Research Society. Hyponatraemia and hypokalaemia during intravenous fluid administration. Arch Dis Child 2008;93:285-7.
8. Freeman MA, Ayus JC, Moritz ML. Maintenance intravenous fluid prescribing practices among paediatric residents. Acta Paediatr 2012;101:e465-8.
9. NICE guideline: Intravenous fluid therapy in children and young people in hospital [published 9 December 2015]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng29.
10. Feld LG, Neuspiel DR, Foster BA, et al. Clinical practice guideline: Maintenance intravenous fluids in children. Pediatrics 2018;142:e20183083.
11. Neville KA, Verge CF, Rosenberg AR, O'Meara MW, Walker JL. Isotonic is better than hypotonic saline for intravenous rehydration of children with gastroenteritis: a prospective randomised study. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:226-32.
12. Don M, Valerio G, Korppi M, Canciani M. Hyponatremia in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatr Nephrol 2008;23:2247-53.
13. Hanna S, Tibby SM, Durward A, Murdoch IA. Incidence of hyponatraemia and hyponatraemic seizures in severe respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:430-4.
14. Alvarex Montañana P, Modesto i Alapont V, Pérez Ocón A, Ortega López P, López Prats JL, Toledo Parreño JD. The use of isotonic fluid as maintenance therapy prevents iatrogenic hyponatremia in pediatrics: a randomized, controlled open study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9:589-97.
15. Rey C, Los-Arcos M, Hernández A, Sánchez A, Díaz JJ, López-Herce J. Hypotonic versus isotonic maintenance fluids in critically ill children: a multicenter prospective randomized study. Acta Paediatr 2011;100:1138-43.
16. Golshekan K, Badeli H, Miri M, et al. Suitable intravenous fluid for preventing dysnatremia in children with gastroenteritis; a randomized clinical trial. J Renal Inj Prev 2016;5:69-73.
17. Guarino A, Ashkenazi S, Gendrel D, Lo Vecchio A, Shamir R, Szajewska H. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition/European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Acute Gastroenteritis in Children in Europe: Update 2014. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014;59:132-52.
18. Ministry of Health, NSW. Infants and children: Management of Acute Gastroenteritis. Fourth edition, Clinical Practice Guideline-GL2014_024. Published on: December 2014.
19. Salido M, Macarron P, Hernández-García C, D'Cruz DP, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Water intoxication induced by low-dose cyclophosphamide in two patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2003;12:636-9.
20. Kannan L, Lodha R, Vivekanandhan S, Bagga A, Kabra SK, Kabra M. Intravenous fluid regimen and hyponatraemia among children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:2303-9.
21. Friedman JN, Beck CE, DeGroot J, et al. Comparison of isotonic and hypotonic intravenous maintenance fluids: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:445-51.
22. McNab S, Duke T, South M, et al. 140 mmol/L of sodium versus 77 mmol/L of sodium in maintenance intravenous fluid therapy for children in hospital (PIMS): a randomised controlled double-blind trial. Lancet 2015;385:1190-7.
23. Flores Robles CM, Cuello Garcia CA. A prospective trial comparing isotonic with hypotonic maintenance fluids for prevention of hospital-acquired hyponatraemia. Paediatrics and International Child Health, 36:3, 168-174. https://doi.org/10.1179/2046905515Y.0000000047.
24. Pemde HK, Dutta AK, Sodani R, Mishra K. Isotonic Intravenous Maintenance Fluid Reduces Hospital Acquired Hyponatremia in Young Children with Central Nervous System Infections. Indian J Pediatr 2015;82:13-8.
25. Balasubramnian K, Kumar P, Saini SS, Attri SV, Dutta S. Isotonic versus hypotonic fluid supplementation in term neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia - A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Acta Paediatr 2012;101:236-41.
26. Hatherill M. Rubbing salt in the wound. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:414-8.
27. Yung M, Keeley S. Randomised controlled trial of intravenous maintenance fluids. J Paediatr Child Health 2009;45:9-14.
28. Coulthard MG, Long DA, Ullman AJ, Ware RS. A randomised controlled trial of Hartmann's solution versus half normal saline in postoperative paediatric spinal instrumentation and craniotomy patients. Arch Dis Child 2012;97:491-6.
29. Neville KA, Sandeman DJ, Rubinstein A, Henry GM, McGlynn M, Walker JL. Prevention of hyponatremia during maintenance intravenous fluid administration: a prospective randomized study of fluid type versus fluid rate. J Pediatr 2010;156:313-9.
30. Royal Melbourne Hospital Clinical Practice Guidelines: IV Fluids - for children beyond the neonatal period. [online, accessed March 2019]. Available from: https://www.rch.org.au/clinicalguide/guideline_index/Intravenous_Fluids/.
31. Toronto Sick Kids Fluid and Electrolyte Administration in Children Clinical Practice Guideline: June 2019. Available from: https://www.sickkids.ca/clinical-practice-guidelines/clinical-practice-guidelines/Export/CLINH17/Main%20Document.pdf.
32. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Inpatient Pathway for Continuous Administration of IV Fluids General Pediatrics: May, 2019. Available from: https://www.chop.edu/clinical-pathway/fluid-administration-continuous-iv-clinical-pathway.
33. Somers MJ. Maintenance intravenous fluid therapy in children. [Up to Date, accessed 25th July 2019].
34. Shafiee MAS, Bohn D, Hoorn EJ and Halperin ML. How to select optimal maintenance intravenous fluid therapy. Q J Med 2003;96:601-10.
35. Hanna S, Tibby SM, Durward A, Murdoch IA. Incidence of hyponatraemia and hyponatraemic seizures in severe respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:430-4.
36. Al Shibli A, Abukhater D, Al Kuwaiti N, et al. Hyponatraemia and neurological complications in children admitted with bronchiolitis. Paediatrics and International Child Health, 36:175-80.